.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
|
3
]
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
|
3
]
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to the_taste_of_cigarettes.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="the_taste_of_cigarettes:204205"]succubus said:[QUOTE]those sound like people with issues[/QUOTE] I agree, but if someone has already decided, and really thinks, truly, that non-whites or gays or women are actually so much a pox that they need to go on and on about it, without policing their own self, then it's likely when pressured to stop, they will find new ways to go out and solve what they feel is a problem. It takes a certain set of issues to get in the vain of blaming people that are different for problems that are seemingly unrelated. It's sort of like Ed Norton's character in American History X. He felt a lot of pressure, his family wasn't doing much to help him find answers; he was speaking out for what he felt was a cause, and then boom, finally he went and joined a clique that would help him achieve his goal. It happens for good and bad. A lot of activist groups become the same way...they stage protests because open dialogue didn't work; then when protests are shut down, they get teeming and angry. I'm not saying it's what I would do, at least not by volition, if my beliefs were challenged...but I am saying it is a common reaction. Truth is, if all someone is gonna do is talk nasty, I'd rather they do that than act on it. At least if they are at the talking phase, they can be reached via talking in return. It's when people go out and use violence, or physical action, to achieve these goals that troubles me. Often by then they are past the point of listening to reason. [/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.017 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][