.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to Kessaris V.2.0.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="Kessaris%20V.2.0:330792"]XBOX never owned any market in any continent. Playstation is #1 Worldwide. It's dominated because it takes the ideas of CD player/DVD player capabilities and puts them in their system. XBOX put the same stuff in, only made it harder 'cause you HAD to go out and buy a controller for the DVD thing. PS2 has a gazillion titles to it...and a lot of them are really good. They also have a nack for beating the competition when it comes to sharing games on other consoles. Take for instance the MEgaMan anthology. The PS2 version has more games and more extra stuff in it than the Nintendo one because Playstation makes agreements with the companies to have their version come out later but with more shit. As for Nintendo going into backrupcy, I don't see it happening. The DS is way ahead of the PSP right now because it is more innovative, even if it isn't as up to date. In the next 10 years, if the Revolution doesn't sell like it should, you could see Nintendo go completely handheld. Then they'll be able to put all their console focus on the handhelds and become unstopable there for the next 20 years. On the other hand, Revolution's controller is innovative, the games will be solid (just think of the next gen Zelda/Mario games). Which leads me to talk about Nintendo's games. True, they gear a lot of focus towards the younger audience, but they still put out top notch games for the adult gamer who grew up with Nintendo. When Windwaker first came out I was like great, way to bastardize the zelda series idiots. But I played it and it was great. It's sorta like...when you first listen to grind or death metal and you can't get past the vocals, but once you do you're totally into it. Same goes for Nintendo. Just gotta get past the cartoony graphics for some games to realize that they do put out quality material. Not to mention the next Zelda game is going to own, and Resident Evil 4 already did. XBOX 360 does have some stuff going for it. But it's just too early for it. They didn't put the time or effort into the system the way Sony did. It's got inferior hardware, an inferior graphics engine, and it won't be able to hold up like the PS3 will be able to in 4 years. In 4 years the graphics on XBOX 360 won't be that greatly improved. PS3 right now is running on 25% of it's capability. Not to mention it's got everything the XBOX has and more. Next-gen belongs to Sony. True, Sony owned the PS2 market with an inferior system, but it's because they put out the better games and thats what really sells. XBOX had a lot of smoke and mirrors going for them. They did have their hits though like Halo which will always sell. But then again, when was the last time you saw a first person shooter not do great? Perfect Dark looks good, but it;s like...where the PC is now with graphics. Put that shit on the PS3 and watch what happens to it though. If XBOX is relying on Halo 3, then I'm sorry they're just going down. Bill Gates does not head XBOX, he financially backs it. I'm sure he oversees production, but he has a staff take care of it for him. And he has nothing to do with anything that is developed by a non-Microsoft software company. All he can do is get agreements with other companies like that to make the games for his system. Which, also, he has other people take care of. He knows what he is doing, but competing with Sony is like trying to compete with Nintendo back in 1986 You can't win this arguement [/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.014 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][