.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to HungtaBleed.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="HungtaBleed:368496"]We'll never find that guy. And if we did, would it even matter? He could be dead for all we know and the tape could be either old or fake. It doesn't matter anymore if he is dead or alive, he is immortalized in the eyes of the Islamo-facists. He did the unthinkable, which is, successfully stage a devastating attack on the country whom they refer to as 'The Great Satan'. What we need to do, that I feel is more important that catching/killing Bin Laden, is win the propaganada war. After all, isn't this what the tape is all about. I find it interesting enough to note that in the midst of the emerging story that Bin Laden is dead, Al Jazeera all of a sudden released a new Bin Laden tape. Coinicidence? or not? Clinton didn't want to get Bin Laden because he felt as if America had no right or the proper authority to get him. This was based solely on the fact that, at the time, he had not committed any such act that would give us the green light to invade a country and apprehend this particular indavidual. In other words, Clinton felt as if he needed a 'search warrent' (for lack of a better term). Insted, we waited untill he killed 3,000 of our citizens. At least we now have the right to attain a search warrent. [/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.004 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][