.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
]
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
]
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to Josh_Martin.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="Josh_Martin:373491"]Dankill said:[QUOTE]Pam. It's not gonna happen. Trust me. It's a scaretactic. Reversing Roe V Wade is political suicide and much harder in terms of law then people think. Supreme court justices can't just wave a wand and change laws they may not like. It has nothing to do with liking a law, they decypher the laws and would have to prove that a law broke other laws by it's presence, therefore is null. People were scared of Regan doing this and they put fuckin Ginsberg in the court. Yeah, I could really see Ruth Ginsberg overturning Roe V Wade. Any party that tried that would create a political firestorm in America that would seriously eclipse the Iraq war debate, protests and civil unrest. The Republicans would be crippled as a party after taking away a hotly contested law that is over thirty years old. [/QUOTE] Boy are you wrong about that. Clinton put Ginsberg on the court, not Reagan. [/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.003 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][