.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
]
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
]
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to ShadowSD.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="ShadowSD:404766"]Anarchy as you described it is a wonderful idealogy. However, putting into practice would only work if everyone complies with whatever laws are established by the votes. I don't see a world where EVERYONE is complicit without any enforcement, it just wouldn't happen. (If it could, we could also make democracy work, by voting out both parties and picking non-corrupt candidates to clean up the system). What impartial institution guarantees that everyone in a local vote would be informed of the time and place of the voting? What if the counting of votes was disputed? What if someone, anyone, loses their temper, at any time, over anything? Even if every individual could learn to answer all those questions, and we all held hands and lived in peace, what about people with mental illnesses? What about drug-induced violent fits? I don't see how we can ever unanimously beat all these things, and it would all have to be unanimous for anarchy to work. However, all realism aside, I have to say, I love the theory. It's something important to have as a goal, for even if a goal is impossible in practice, the effort to reach it yields its own rewards. [/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.003 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][