.:.:.:.:RTTP.Mobile:.:.:.:.
[<--back] [Home][Pics][News][Ads][Events][Forum][Band][Search]
full forum | bottom

jump pages:[all|1|2|3]
jump pages:[all|1|2|3]

---

Reply
[login ]
SPAM Filter: re-type this (values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to Man_of_the_Century.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="Man_of_the_Century:441326"]HailTheLeaf said:[QUOTE]Our government helped Saddam into power and supported him, for years, while he murdered thousands of people. No one had a problem with it before. Come on, you think we're actually over there to help the people in Iraq? The ones we're not even keeping a bodycount on? In fact there are many other dictators who were just as bad if not worse to their own people than Saddam, and we haven't invaded those countries to save anyone, in fact we're buddy-buddy with alot of them while they continue to torture and kill their own people, and we're fine with that. We were never there to remove Saddam, he was just a minor detail. Ha, I mean Cheney just went to hang out in Kazakhstan and Azerbaijan after giving Russia shit over human rights problems. Talk about hypocrisy. [/QUOTE] Yup, we did help him into power, and it was a mistake (people make those sometimes). When it was publicly known that he was killing his own people, we cut ties with Iraq. So, yeah, we did have a problem with that before. Do I think we (by that, I mean Bush) are there to help those people. Nope. Does that change the fact that those people need our help? Nope. Which countries were we buddy-buddy with while they killed thier people? Make sure when you look for examples you make sure we were helping them while we knew it was going on. Not we were helping them before the killing, and didn't know (and saying "we had to know" doesn't count - only proof does)or after the killings, in an attempt to solve the situation diplomaticly.[/QUOTE]

top [Vers. 0.12][ 0.004 secs/8 queries][refresh][