.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to ShadowSD.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="ShadowSD:452491"]How is that supposed to negate Bush changing his position after he was elected? If your argument is that the 2003 quote is technically correct because it mentioned the clean air act, and the 1999 quote didn't, that's still very deceptive on his part to suggest he had a different position back when he was convincing people to vote for him. Alternet is making two points here, that Bush is not to be trusted, and that the energy industry's opinions are mirrored in public policy; both easy points to make. You suggest they're striking out because they're misinterpreting what the clean air act says, but where in that quote do they make ANY assertions about what is or is not in the act? [/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.003 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][