.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
]
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
]
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to retzam.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="retzam:27425"]the_reverend said:[QUOTE]Math Proof youi mean. p => q q => r therefore p =>r however, joe/nc took this and made an incorrect statement by taking p => q q => r therefore r => p which isn't correct cause they don't have a <=> relationship. you can't go backwards in an implies statement joe! you get a 0% on this test, you should have slacked off. (did I mention I have a computer science degree?)[/QUOTE] Well, Rev, not quite. You see, I used the Law of Detachment to state my fact. Your example shows the Chain Rule. See the difference? [/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.015 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][