.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to MarkFuckingRichards.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="MarkFuckingRichards:515261"]Kevord said:[QUOTE]Saw 2 was o.k. All the scenes with Donnie Walburg were terrible and it brought the whole movie down. The problem with 3 is it jumped around way too much and relied too much on Gore rather than really trying to build suspense.[/QUOTE] i would agree that it did rely a very large amount on gore, BUT that's the main reason i like horror movies, so it worked out well for me. i hated saw 1 mainly because there was nothing holding it together as a solid movie. the acting was absolutely horrendous, which is typical of some of the best cheesy horror films. BUT, there was not enough gore to back up the shitty acting. and the shitty acting gave away some important parts of the movie, as well as made it unbearable for me to watch. that also killed the suspense and mystery of it for me. i still need to see saw 2.[/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.005 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][