Kerry's a Douche...[views:5810][posts:23]____________________________________ [Nov 2,2006 12:47pm - PatMeebles ""] but I'm Voting For Her Anyway [img] |
| ________________________________________________ [Nov 2,2006 12:56pm - whiskey_weed_and_women ""] http://movies.crooksandliars.com/CD-SC-KerryJoke.wmv |
| _______________________________________________ [Nov 2,2006 1:02pm - whiskey_weed_and_women ""] The mainstream media never ceases to amaze. They have been attacking Kerry left and right for his comments, yet they never once attacked Bush for making jokes about the very reason we have lost over 2,800 soldiers |
| _____________________________________ [Nov 2,2006 1:11pm - the_reverend ""] geez, someone watched the daily show last night |
| _______________________________________________ [Nov 2,2006 1:14pm - whiskey_weed_and_women ""] the_reverend said:geez, someone watched the daily show last night nope i was at the Livingroom watching MotA kickass, where were you. but yeah i did see the clip on crooks and liars. |
| ___________________________________ [Nov 2,2006 1:21pm - PatMeebles ""] Ummm, this was supposed to be a dumb Kerry Healey joke. |
| _______________________________________________ [Nov 2,2006 1:23pm - whiskey_weed_and_women ""] pfft shes not even worth a joke. |
| _____________________________________ [Nov 2,2006 1:25pm - the_reverend ""] was Mota listed on the events page? no? that's why. add fucking shows to the events pages faggots. |
| _________________________________ [Nov 2,2006 1:27pm - SteveOTB ""] [img] |
| _____________________________________ [Nov 2,2006 1:28pm - the_reverend ""] man, I see what he means though. those troops spelled help rong. |
| _______________________________________________ [Nov 2,2006 1:30pm - whiskey_weed_and_women ""] the_reverend said:was Mota listed on the events page? no? that's why. add fucking shows to the events pages faggots. haha yeah it never ceases to amaze me how little pvd people care so little about shows in that state. the venue was pretty empty the show really should have been at as220. i mean maybe 20peeps |
| _____________________________________ [Nov 2,2006 1:40pm - the_reverend ""] if it had been on the events page, I could have gotten a few $$ from a magazine that just requested pictures from me. |
| ________________________________ [Nov 2,2006 2:22pm - W3 nli ""] the_reverend said:if it had been on the events page, I could have gotten a few $$ from a magazine that just requested pictures from me. you changed man, you changed when did it become about the money. you changed man :stupidflanders: |
| ________________________________________ [Nov 2,2006 2:53pm - CaptainCleanoff ""] I think it is retarded how the media and people bitch about the number of soldiers we've lost over the last three years in Iraq. What people forget is we lost 600,000 soldiers in just ONE battle over the course of a month in the battle of the bulge during WW2. Most of the American casualties occurred within the first three days of battle. It sucks about any loss of life over there but it is war. Figure it out. The PC media just reports every single american soldiers; death to discredit the current administration that everyone seems to hate. I am not big on GW but get the fuck over yourselves. Oh yeah, and fuck Kerry. If he becomes president I guarantee we would be attacked again here in the USA as the terrorists know he is a scumfuck pacifist. |
| ___________________________________ [Nov 3,2006 9:27am - anonymous ""] CaptainCleanoff said:I think it is retarded how the media and people bitch about the number of soldiers we've lost over the last three years in Iraq. What people forget is we lost 600,000 soldiers in just ONE battle over the course of a month in the battle of the bulge during WW2. Most of the American casualties occurred within the first three days of battle. It sucks about any loss of life over there but it is war. Figure it out.QUOTE] it's not the number of soldiers, it's the reason for war. figure it out. |
| ________________________________________ [Nov 3,2006 9:34am - CaptainCleanoff ""] anonymous said:CaptainCleanoff said:I think it is retarded how the media and people bitch about the number of soldiers we've lost over the last three years in Iraq. What people forget is we lost 600,000 soldiers in just ONE battle over the course of a month in the battle of the bulge during WW2. Most of the American casualties occurred within the first three days of battle. It sucks about any loss of life over there but it is war. Figure it out.QUOTE] it's not the number of soldiers, it's the reason for war. figure it out. You do not deserve a response as you have no identity. |
| ___________________________________ [Nov 3,2006 9:43am - anonymous ""] I will be a Fascist Pig!! SUICIDAL!!! |
| __________________________________ [Nov 4,2006 12:43pm - TJ_Xenos ""] Ok. Hitler killed hundreds of thousands and had invaded nearly a score of countries in the context of attempted global domination when we went into europe. Saddam hadnt had anyone outside of his LEGALLY RECOGNIZED SOVEREIGN BORDERS in 10 years, had no link to 9/11 (the initial justification), had no weapons of mass destruction, and really had no ambition than to maintain autonomous control of his country until he passed. I think the 600,000 dead in the battle of the bulge is a much lesser tragedy than 3000 dead in iraq (plus scores of thousands of iraqis) since atleast the 600,000 died for a reason. The united states is a lot like a corrupt cop. |
| ______________________________________ [Nov 4,2006 12:56pm - tbone_r nli ""] CaptainCleanoff said:anonymous said:CaptainCleanoff said:I think it is retarded how the media and people bitch about the number of soldiers we've lost over the last three years in Iraq. What people forget is we lost 600,000 soldiers in just ONE battle over the course of a month in the battle of the bulge during WW2. Most of the American casualties occurred within the first three days of battle. It sucks about any loss of life over there but it is war. Figure it out.QUOTE] it's not the number of soldiers, it's the reason for war. figure it out. You do not deserve a response as you have no identity. that was me |
| _________________________________ [Nov 4,2006 1:13pm - TJ_Xenos ""] Also, technically under the UN charter the war is "illegal", and basically "terrorism" But oh yeah, the UN is irrelevent except when it suits the goals of the zionists (ie Lebanon has to disarm militias but fuck res242) in power. Sure you can make the argument that an international organization or radical muslims are bent on overthrowing us and therefore any muslim that gets in our way is a legitimate target, but were that the case, then hitler would be justified in acting out against the jews as a proactive defense to the jewish world council's declaration of "holy war" on germany, saddam in killing dissidents behind assassination attempts, and any wacko paranoiac with a gun would be justified in killing everyone who he (rightly or wrongly) perceived as a threat to him. All situations the antagonist (and others) perceives themself as being justified out of self preservation but as they say the road to hell is paved with good intentions. If you think having more might makes the US justified in all ways, you really ought to be supporting hussein or bin laden or someone who actually ideologically agrees with you that might makes right and reflexively patriotically supporting a country that's supposed to be about intellect, freedom, liberty, and autonomy yet acts the same as what it decries as fascists and terrorists. In both cases there is a complete lack of moral regard for life and rights, regardless of blatantly transparent claims of the one that nobody not wholly indoctinated actually believes... |
| ______________________________________ [Nov 4,2006 1:16pm - lollercopter ""] all aboard the lollercopter please |
| ___________________________________ [Nov 4,2006 2:06pm - burnitdown ""] This war is too short-sighted. We should be invading Russia, or China, or someone else who will put up a good fight. |
| ____________________________________________ [Nov 4,2006 2:39pm - mike.............. ""] medical care in battle is much more advanced then it was in wwII, many of the 600k would have been saved if the technology was there to bring people to medics quickly on site then bring them to a military hospital. i was reading an article the other day, ill try to find it and post it, it was saying how this war is creating more amputees then past wars because instead of dying on the field, soldiers are getting treatments. its def a good thing more people are survivng, but its a hard road when you have to deal with a loss of a limb after serving. |
| _______________________________________ [Nov 4,2006 2:54pm - DestroyYouAlot ""] mike.............. said:i was reading an article the other day, ill try to find it and post it, it was saying how this war is creating more amputees then past wars because instead of dying on the field, soldiers are getting treatments. I saw that too. Someone needs to cash in on the "I left my extremities in Baghdad" t-shirt market. There's a killing to be made. "I went to Iraq and all I got was this lousy disability check." |