.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to MarkFuckingRichards.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="MarkFuckingRichards:561862"]xanonymousx said:[QUOTE]i kinda like the old logo better.. it kinda seems this guy has two fonts he uses with everyband... i'm not an artist and could not do that but i say music is more important than a logo... although in todays age it doesn't seem to be the case.[/QUOTE] it definitely sucks that people will judge a book by its cover, or in this case a band by their logo, but to me a band is more than just the music. i agree that overall the music is more important than the logo, but sometimes if a band is represented by horrendous or very cliche/generic art and design, the importance of the music is almost void. a lot of people tend to overlook the music itself if the band has a "stupid" or "gay" logo, band name, t shirt design, haircut, song title, album cover, etc. if a band has amazing music and a good sense of direction in the visuals department, on top of lyrics that don't look like anti-social stream-of-conscious from a 14 year old's notebook, and a great live show, they are the full package. there are so many bands in all sorts of genres, even bands trying to make new genres these days, so the bands who show that they put a lot of effort into making an impact on the music world will prevail and most likely stick around for more than a year or two. [/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.004 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][