.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
]
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
]
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to Murph nli.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="Murph%20nli:573585"]hungtableed said:[QUOTE]hungtableed said:[QUOTE]ahhhhhhhhh! Global Warming! What I love is that the same assholes who tout this environmental crisis shit were in the 60s and 70s telling us that is was getting warmer. In the 90s when they didn't know what the fuck to say the called it El Nino, something that no one could really explain to you what it really was. Now we got this broad who looks like the son of Axl Rose telling us that it's a fact that it's cause by humans, like she even went to college let alone took any environmental science classes. After all the propaganda and Al Gore's powerpoint presentation, it's still just a theory. What you don't pay any attention to is that there are just as many 'scientists' saying that it's not caused by humans. [/QUOTE] *in the 60s and 70s were telling us that is was getting COLDER (i.e. look up the Kennedy's history on environmental issues in the 60s and 70s my typo, too bad I didn't log in so that I could fix it. [/QUOTE] First off, completely off subject, in the 60's we still had segregated communities and women made almost 1/2 of what men made in the workforce. So there is no infallibility. Not that there is now, but I'm guessing "facts" and their execution were a little more susceptible to narrower view. Now, on subject. Well, with all the glaciers melting in to the sea, I'm sure, based on currents, it would seem the Earth was getting colder. Measuring the temperature and change in aquatic life, one would assume an Ice Age was not too far out of the question. Also, with the amount of byproduct pumped into the air, our oxygen could become less and less, and if hydrogen, which is much lighter, became the normal gas, we'd not only be dead, but quite cold. I'm not sure of those studies, but I'm sure there are ways to view changes that would precipitate cold. HOWEVER, even if some aspects of global warming cannot be ascribed to human action (even though most of it is an after effect, a variation due to increased fluorocarbon emissions and increased byproduct thrown into the air. Many people don't realize, when gases are released into the atmosphere, they dont just sit there. They bond to form new substances, and many of the things the bond with are hydrogen and carbon, but also oxygen. Which means we are losing air purity due to these chemical amalgamations. If you don't believe humans cause it, then believe we can at least help fight against it. For proof, look no farther than the Australians. Their tight flourocarbon laws have helped greatly repair some areas where ozone had been depleted. I don't get it. People have to realize that our planet began as an ANAEROBIC entity, which through mutation of life created oxygen in huge amounts and dissipated many of the more prevalent gases in the atmosphere. If we keep pumping our anaerobic waste into the air, we could revert someday. The amount of plantlife destroyed from this earth is not there anymore to help synthesize the carbon from the air to leave pure oxygen. I mean, it really is simple science and environmental cautiousness. It is not a definite thing, but why not try to manuever the future toward a healthy (for our aerobic beings) state instead of leaving it even more open to chance (meteors, nuclear wars, volcanic issues). [/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.005 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][