.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to soloman.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="soloman:626280"]xmikex said:[QUOTE] I think that's kind of missing the point. I'm not by any means saying I agree with creationism, or this museum (in fact, I find it all pretty laughable). But I think the point they're trying to make by trying to come at it empirically (if you can call ignoring years and years of already solid research and theory regarding the creation of the word truly "empirical") is that their faith, i.e. the bible alleges certain specific details which they feel they can prove. They're probably (definently) wrong, but I think it's kind of refreshing to see someone from the creationist side approach the subject with at least an ounce of respect for people's intelligence and need for factual evidence. Again, IF you can call it that. Personally, I think it's interesting to hear other arguments like this. [/QUOTE] Yeah it's definitly interesting hearing arguments like this. The problem is that looking at the bible empircally is going to fail. And it should. Both the old and new testaments say that faith (believing what is not proven) is the big point anyway, so this exercise in evidence gathering is pointless. I think the goal here, in regards to this musem, was to create a place where the faithful can hide themselves from secular science. Thats stupid and cowardly. [/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.009 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][