.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
]
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
]
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to Niccolai.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="Niccolai:631823"]The bottom would be a 59'paul and the top would be a 59 reissue = ) gibson used to have this picture on their website. Guess why they took it down? rounding off the set and cutting the butt short on a plank will let you sortof 'rock' the neck blank back and forth so you can find the proper neck angle with the corresponding bridge (top picture). It works well in theory for finding the angle and it's cheaper and easier then just cutting the plan to the right angle, but I'd like to know how the hell neck-to-body resonance get's praised on a joint like that. Also, you can easilly tell it's not an epiphone or a cheap model because it has a full maple top (not a veneer like epiphones) and it's fully quilted. So yea, it's no secret that Gibson QC is down the toilet lately... but I guess they DO haveto fill every wall of every guitar center in America with their products, so they need more economical construction methods.[/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.003 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][