.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to orgymf@work.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="orgymf@work:837267"][QUOTE="HTR:837260"]· $2.55 billion MORE added this year to the lucrative pensions for retired stategovernment employees - who get 2-3 times the retirement income you'll get if you're an average taxpayer. Government employees retire in their 40's 50's and early 60's - while you have to work until your late 60s.QUOTE] not true at all. my boss is 62, has worked here for 34 years, and still needs 3 more to retire, i am 28, been here four years, i got a long road ahead. and while we do have better retirement plans than most in the private sector, remember 2 things 1.state workers do not pay into (and therefor do not recivev benefits from) social security 2.they take a fairly ridiculous amount of our paychecks for that retirement plan....it's not like we don't pay for it. and as far as cities and towns having to fund their own shit....while it may be true in some areas, you also have to remember that 1.much of that city money comes from a state grant 2.many cities have STATE colleges, STATE hospitals and STATE police. question one is a bad idea. could Taxachusetts do a better job with managing the money they suck out of our checks? absolutely. but you get rid of taxes, you'll notice a big difference (for the worse) in the (not so distant) future[/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.003 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][