.:.:.:.:RTTP.Mobile:.:.:.:.
[<--back] [Home][Pics][News][Ads][Events][Forum][Band][Search]
full forum | bottom

---

Reply
[login ]
SPAM Filter: re-type this (values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to the_reverend.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="the_reverend:837443"][QUOTE="HTR:837310"]Actualy if you wanna get super technical the judges of the U.S. Supreme Court rejected any claims that the 16th Amendment changed the constitutional limits on direct taxes in Brushaber v. Union Pacific R.R. Co., 240 U.S. 1, when they ruled that it "created no new power of taxation" and that it "did not change the constitutional limitations which forbid any direct taxation of individuals". Therefor one could conclude that all income taxes are suspect.[/QUOTE]oh yeah, tell that to the federal tax that is the exact same thing. good for the gander. if the income tax is "voted down" it will mean NOTHING. mass will not lose the income tax.[/QUOTE]

top [Vers. 0.12][ 0.003 secs/8 queries][refresh][