.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
]
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
]
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to JustinSteele.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="JustinSteele:1022914"]I would figure the best possible outcome, other than the complete eradication of political parties, would be some kind of functional equilibrium between liberal and conservative and their respective, albeit erroneously labeled, parties. By and large, the liberal ideology states that we, collectively known as "The Government", can band together via our elected representatives and solve many of the problems that plague our society. In the event of a liberal dominated government, the right's position should be to try to be the auditing force within the government and to act as accountants for the money being spent. On the other hand, a more conservative government would benefit from liberals being the conscience economically, that comes in and notices when markets are becoming too top heavy and are not providing for the gross majority (which markets always do). This balance would provide the best active and reactive forces that could not only help provide for those who do not have enough while not sacrificing the liberty of those who have worked the hardest and have been fortunate to obtain wealth. I don't think this is impossible, it just requires us holding our elected officials accountable and being a thoughtful, knowledgeable populace. [/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.003 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][