.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
|
3
]
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
|
3
]
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to orgymf@work.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="orgymf@work:842993"][QUOTE="c.DeAD:842983"]Oh, and "Boondock Saints" was awful. Terrible acting, crappy dialogue and thats not even the half of it. I never understood why everyone raved about that movie, so I checked it out. B-movie worthy of having Val Kilmer or Steven Seagal in it.[/QUOTE] ????????????? Billy Connoly, Norman Reedus = amazing acting! Ron Jeremy getting shot while jerking off = fuckin awesome David Della Rocco = should be in way more movies, he rules! the prayer, the speech in the courthouse, "Funny Man" akwardly telling the racist joke, making fun of the lesbian in the meat packing plant etc. etc. etc. awesome dialogue the only bad acting i saw was the few times that Sean Flannery fucked up and forgot to use an accent, and the editing mistake when the russian punches "Funny Man". saying that that movie had bad actors and bad dialogue proves you know as much about movies as i know about being skinny (which i haven't been since i was 13) oh....and i almost forgot....Willam Dafoe as a gay man who hated queeny fags and treated them the way womanizers treat broads = fucking hysterical[/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.003 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][