.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to orgymf@work.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="orgymf@work:909186"][QUOTE="niccolai:909027"][QUOTE="corpus_colostomy:908880"][QUOTE="niccolai:908763"]for persons over 21? bull shit. an 18 year old can die in your military, but he can't smoke a little pot.[/QUOTE] nor can he drink. seems basic.[/QUOTE] Not comparable. Drinking is actually dangerous. people under 21 are statistically very likely to drive drunk. That perticular age group is statistically likely to be involved in an accident even without alchohol presant. (which is why car insurence is so high for people under 21) Legalizing alchohol for that age group would obviously increase the likelihood of fatalities in an age group thats already accident prone. Pot isn't as harmful behind the wheel of a car. [/QUOTE] pot is more harmful than most potheads want to believe and less harmful than most anti-pot ads want you to believe. period. see that resin in your bowl/bong/whatever? that's tar. it's in your lungs too. by the way, ANY smoke (cigs, pot, crack) is bad for you. and although many pot smokers think they drive better when stoned, i have seen many many potheads who believe exactly that, and they drive like retards when they are baked, accidentally blowing stop lights, less attentive, etc. stop trying to make it seem innocent and harmless. but regardless of that, it should be legal and taxed, and 21 should be the age (unless they lower the drinking age)[/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.004 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][