.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to dreadkill.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="dreadkill:1046257"][QUOTE="RustyPS:1046251"][QUOTE="dreadkill:1046238"][QUOTE="MillenialKingdom:1046233"]I say it's a long shot and probably not practical but why not go after Brian Westbrook? It's been a long time since the Pats had a productive running back and I think Westbrook still has it. Still surprised the Eagles cut him. Hell, even the Chargers cut Tomlinson. This looks like an exciting free agency. [/QUOTE]i'd throw a few bucks at tomlinson. i'd rather have the current tomlinson than some of the backs the pats have. westbrook might retire because of his knee. [/QUOTE]I don't want either of them....LT is a glorified goal line back now, and that's it....and Faulk gives you everything Westbrook does without being injury prone[/QUOTE]i wouldn't mind LT but i feel exactly the same way you do about westbrook. when he's healthy, he's better than faulk, but at this point i don't see him being as valuable as faulk. he'd cost more and would play less. not worth it.[/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.004 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][