.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to ark.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="ark:1065681"]like reim said, IF comcast has their way, you wouldn't see any extra money, and less users hit your site, because they would hold they keys to what their subscribers could access. the internet would become a tiered service like cable tv channels are. you want the social networking package, that's $5 a month. youtube and hulu? $15 a month because that means you'd be watching less tv. The actual content providers (like how YouTube is part of Google) would be pretty pissed about this. That's why Google is siding with the FCC on this one. I really don't see this ruling have too many far-reaching implications because of that. Even if Comcast did restrict these there are ways around it. It's the friggin internet.[/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.008 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][