.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
|
3
]
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
|
3
]
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to TheRidersofDoom.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="TheRidersofDoom:1150919"][QUOTE="arilliusbm:1150721"] If anything, we'll possibly split the country up into different areas in the next 20-30 years or so, after WWIII, that is. [/QUOTE] This is my political wet-dream Historically it is much more difficult to rule a large landmass than a small landmass look at the examples: Rome, Ancient Persia, Alexander the Great's empire, Russia, China, India, U.S.A., and Britian. All have had long and bumpy histories both within and without their borders. Areas like Iceland, Norway, many small European republics, Sweden, and other countries have had relatively easier histories except for where the big guys above fucked with them. The thing is Jefferson knew he committed a grave crime when he bought the Louisiana purchase. He is said to have regretted it the rest of his life for not only was it against the constitution but he knew it would bring us into many conflicts both with the remaining European empires in the western hemisphere and the natives who were already pushed out there to make room for the seaboard colonies. I say we break the union before it comes to a civil war round 2. I don't give a fuck about this divided we fall crap, that's just starry-eyed propaganda meant to make sure it's easier for us to be raped by politicians and corporations as a whole. plus, who wants to be in a union with states like kansas, alabama, georgia, tennesse, mississippi? [/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.007 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][