.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
]
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
]
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to Headbanging_Man.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="Headbanging_Man:1200430"]I don't think that's evidence, I was just wondering if that was maybe the nine claims of OBL's death referred to in the video. As for evidence, there are 2 streams that follow: the testimony of Benazir Bhutto, who, unlike, say Robert Baer or Madeline Albright, was actually in a position to know... And by the same token, her predecessor Musharraf and widower al Zardari would also likely be prone to the same internal Pakistani information. The other stream is at least slightly corroborated by the Pieczenik interview, namely the handful of Pakistani and other news reports of OBL's natural death circa December 13, 2001. Bhutto claimed Omar Saeed Sheik murdered OBL, and he was captured in February 2002, so both of these possibilities indicated an OBL dead for at least 9 years. Neither is a strong chain of evidence, but both are certainly more substantial than anything offered by the Pentagon/CIA via their lackey O-bomb-a... And are supported by further logical analysis, in re: the lack of Osama tapes (other than CIA fakes) after 9/28/01, and the unlikeliness of someone with severely advanced kidney disease could have survived this long (even if the discussion of marfan syndrome is ignored).[/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.003 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][