.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
]
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
]
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to xmikex.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="xmikex:1225819"]The 3-4, for all its smoke & mirror advantages, is such a fickle setup. It essentially hinges on 3 or 4 different guys to make the whole 11 work effectively, and they all have comparatively rare skill sets. Given the complexion of the NFL today, and who is available in free agency I don't think it's a bad idea at all to experiment with some 4-3 packages. I think you're absolutely right in that it's kind of Belichick's dream to have a defense that can come out in a 3-4 package, or a 4-3 package on any given down any week and have opposing OC's forced to plan for 2 different defenses. The Pats brought in Tommie Harris for a workout who is another 4-3 guy. I think he might be the insurance plan on Marcus Stroud. His experience is in the 4-3 interior, but given that his strength is being a space eater and not so much a pass rusher I'm interested to see if they try him at 3-4 DE. [/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.004 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][