.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
]
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
]
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to Ripley Scott.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="Ripley%20Scott:1303899"][QUOTE="joeyvsdavidlopan:1303896"] Still, the reproductive system isn't directly connected to the digestive system, which is how the chestburster gets implanted, so I don't buy that she had a queen within herself. What if, by virtue of Shaw being a female, the uber-facehugger had the necessary DNA inside of itself to implant a queen, at which point the host's gender wouldn't matter? [/QUOTE] That's why gender matters. In preceding films, we see Queens only come out of female hosts. What if either the facehugger fetus implanted a xeno before being removed, or like the others in the film the exposure to the black toxin turns Shaw herself into a xeno? With SHAW being female, there's the chance it's a queen. Facehuggers just implant xeno embryos. I think the determination of queen/warrior is by the host. Also, I do not believe the creature at the end is necessarily a queen. I think the big deal was that there was a face hugger big enough to impregnate an Engineer, creating a new type of Alien we haven't seen before - the same type that wiped out the Engineer crew and the original "Space Jockey". It could be a queen, but I don't think that detail is as important as "look - bigger badder xenos for the next movie!" [/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.005 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][