.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
]
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
]
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to DestroyYouAlot.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="DestroyYouAlot:1281422"][QUOTE="BobNOMAAMRooney:1281419"][QUOTE="DestroyYouAlot:1281385"]WTF is wrong with just "fat"? Can we maybe just get over the stupid associations one word has before we try and switch it around with new ones that mean the same thing? There are fat chicks, that, let's just say, I totally would. There are some that I would not. Was that so hard?[/QUOTE] Exactly [/QUOTE] I just feel like, if we're gonna have all these precious codewords to avoid calling the thing that it is, what it is (when I was 240 pounds, my midsection was not sheathed in a thick layer of "zaftig"), we need some kind of Homeland Security-style color chart to keep'em straight.[/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.011 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][