.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
]
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
]
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to Boozegood.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="Boozegood:1340305"][QUOTE="Arrow%20NLI:1340301"] I assure you, I'm very well deducated. Whatever that means. [/quote] Posting from my phone. [quote]From what I've read, Blackwater was storing weapons they were not legally allowed to possess on US soil, and were using the Sherrif's storage to skirt the issue. Quite a few sites present it this way as well. [/quote] You read wrong, than. Did you read the link I posted? That was not the issue at all. Also; the weapons were being stored on the BW compound, the Sherrif's department did not have an armory. [quote] And further, quite a few PMC (private military contractors, as acronyms are for faggots and most here won't know what you're saying) have long been in the practice of purchasing and arming themselves outside the country to skirt similar rules. [/quote] That's not how it works at all ("skirting rules"), but okay. For instance all the weapons I use are furnished by the US Department of State when we are in country. [quote]So while you may have a point that somehow some machine guns are legal to own, I'm sure you know exactly how much that argument exists on technicality and loopholes. Or, could you explain how I could go get MYSELF a fully automatic rifle? Last I looked even your class 3 weapons are illegal in a third of the country. [/quote] There are no technicalities or loopholes, they are NFA firearms. And sure, if you really want one: http://www.ar15.com/content/legal/nfaFAQ.html [quote] It's like saying a 1957 Chevy is street legal because you saw one at an auto show. [/quote] No, it would be like saying a 1957 Chevy is street legal because I have driven one legally on the street myself multiple times. [quote]I am not really on the other side of the argument from you. We agree, mostly. But you're trying way to hard to give the impression that a machine gun can be purchased and owned by the average FID carrier, which is bullshit. [/QUOTE] No I'm not. I've said they aren't easy to possess more then once in this thread in fact. I'm saying that they are legal for civilians to own. That's all. I'm stating facts to correct conjecture by the gun-control advocates in this thread who are under the impression that it is illegal for civilians to own automatic weapons, grenade launchers, tanks, artillery, etc. I'm not arguing or insulting anyone or at least I'm trying not to. I'm stating facts; that's all. [/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.004 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][