.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to RustedAngel.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="RustedAngel:380194"]First off, if you want to hear distinctive differences between ENGL models just go to http://www.rocksolidamps.com/ and there are sound clips of each. There are plenty of bands especially euro bands that have been using ENGL amps for recordings for a while, as Mark mentioned necrophagist, and evergrey. Also another band that uses them are Primal Fear and their tone is ridiculously awesome. Darkane has used the Savage 120. The great thing about them is you don't really have to put anything through the front or loop to improve the sound. They are also great bedroom amps as well because you don't have to crank them to sound good like most other amps. We used my ENGL -> VHT cab for the porphyria recording which you may or may not have heard and for only having a day to record guitars it came out pretty well. http://www.porphyria666.com/mp3/Porphyria-EP-1-What_No_Eyes_Could_See.mp3 As far as comparing VHT/Bogner/ENGL it's really just a matter of opinion. I just know that more people with recognizable tone are using ENGL and not so much bogner/vht. VHT's are like a mean marshall so if that sound works for you, awesome. I actually wouldn't mind having the VHT ultralead with the EQ. The Cab makes a big difference with ENGL. I've tried Mesa/GenzBenz/Vader/Carvin cabs and I still prefer VHT cabs. You can't really go wrong with marshall 1960's either. [/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.005 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][